@snder Why would you "silence" them? Makes no sense. Just cos you dont agree with someone doesnt remove their right to say whatever they want to say. Your view is your view and theirs is theirs. Neither may be right. Yours may be. Theirs may be. Surely the conversation is more important than the outcome? Cancel culture is evil and appalling and should be fought against by all with a mind. Remember how people react to words or media is entirely their choice not the choice of its creator.
@snder Yeah im totally cool with you doing whatever you want with your own instance as long as your users are supportive. They always have the option to go elsewhere. I know my instance (socnet.supes.com) will welcome gab with open arms and anyone else who has anything to say even if I personally disagree with them. I think its good you are asking your users I just think this hysteria around #gab is way out of control. Talk of app developers blocking them is just appalling!
Thanks 🙂 I'm always asking my users before I make major changes! I'm also just a user on the platform but I just happen to have root access haha
Well there are multiple side here.. Gab is fucked because there apps where removed from the App and Play Sores so I totally get the fear of being removed when you allow gab for instance (lol) On the other side i'm not a big fan of blocking, trust me.. I have my issues with Eugen! But the user comes first with me soo!
I think the issue is you cant start something as open source free speech blah blah then change your position when you dont agree with free speech. Its hypocritical and pathetic. open source is like giving birth to a child. You dont know what life choices it will make or direction in life. If you dont agree stop contributing dont try and control it
Linus lost control just as Eugen is loosing control. yes it has nothing to do with free speech. Eugen and other early adopters used free speech as a selling point of the platform. Lack of central control etc etc. Reality is the platform should be encouraging Gab. the number of daily active users will go through the roof and thats a good thing. Just cos you disagree with their views or politics does not make them any less valuable to the platform as anyone else.
It's absolutly okay to have an opinion but I need to say that's it's a very grey area when people are calling for free speech or just posting hate and racism..
I can't say that I know the difference it's very hard but what I do know is that I want to create an online place where people can feel safe and post what they want with in their minds the guidelines.
quey is easy, sinblr is a lot harder but on a very different level.
Mate my view is it doesnt matter what people are saying it is the consumer of the information who needs to take responsibility of how they react and what they do from there. If someone is spouting shit of any kind be it racist or be it I dont like the car you drive I as a consumer decide to block that individual or just ignore it. People need to take the responsibility. Not everyone will agree with you or think the same as you. It is up to you what you do with your own reaction
@dude @noor @snder Well im glad there are people on that platform that are pushing free speech as something important. This cancel culture is counter productive and needs to be called out for what it is. Anyway my instance will not censor or block any other instance. If users want to block people they are free to do so but I wont be doing it at the instance level ever
I'm taking a wait-and-see approach. Gab maybe full of Nazis or it might not be. I don't really know, and some of the people hyperventilating about Gab label everyone who disagrees with them as a Nazi (e.g. Candace Owens). Keep in mind, many of them also said LibremOne was full of Nazis, but so far LibremOne is excessively tame.
Now if Gab is full of Nazis or white supremacists, then they'll be banned. Life's too short to put up with stupid shit like that.
Totally agree, judging a group of people by the words of a few is not productive or positive. As users we dont have to have conversations with or even see users we dont like for whatever reason. The tools are there. My frustration is the hysteria and grandstanding around this. Its like "im more woke than you" competition and its unedifying
Silencing seems to be far more evil. You spend time crafting a polite response to a post with a carefully worded counter argument only to find that your post is thrown away and they never see it.
I can call @email@example.com and know he’ll never be offended, because he will never see this post
@ChrisWilson @UltraCommie @rcode3 @snder @Supes Depends on who is doing the silencing or banning. Once politicians are on fediverse I think they should never ban, only silence. I'm OK with them saying "I never want to see your responses", not OK with "I never want anyone else to see your responses". Unless I misunderstand how silencing works on mastodon?
Well, I am over here and I can say the following:
Normal people exist here that is just interested in cooking, tea, playing chess etc
There is a higher amount of idiots that is posting "lets kill kikes" and so on - and they are getting quite the amount of upvotes, boosts and likes.
I do recommend silencing gab.com
This instance is strictly a "free speech" instance. SJWs are welcome but do not expect to be protected here. Personal abuse will not be tolerated, open discussion and hard talk are ok but do not play the man. Anything goes, no censorship ever!